Overview
Building a voice AI agent is only half the challenge. You also need to know it handles real conversations reliably. A good evaluation strategy progresses through two phases:- Local testing: Iterate on your LLM prompts quickly without needing live audio services, reducing cost and tightening the feedback loop during development.
- Production evaluation: Automated simulations and observability for deployed agents, catching regressions and tracking quality over time with real user traffic.
Local prompt testing
Before investing in full end-to-end simulations, focus on getting your LLM prompts right. Pipecat’s architecture makes it straightforward to test your agent’s conversational logic without running STT or TTS services, saving both time and cost during development. The most efficient way to iterate on prompts is to bypass audio entirely and send text directly to your LLM pipeline. This lets you validate conversational logic, function calling, and response quality in seconds rather than minutes. You can configure your pipeline to accept text input instead of audio by replacing STT with a transcript-based input:- Test prompt variations rapidly without waiting for audio processing
- Validate function calling behavior with specific user inputs
- Build repeatable test cases for edge cases and failure modes
- Run tests in CI without audio infrastructure
Production evaluation
Once your prompts are solid and you’ve validated the local experience, production evaluation tools help you scale testing and monitor quality across real deployments. This is where evaluation platforms come in.Simulations
Automated test conversations exercise your agent’s behavior across scenarios, edge cases, and failure modes before they reach users. Simulation platforms can connect to your agent via API, WebSocket, or telephony to run scripted or AI-driven test calls. Key things to test with simulations:- Multi-turn flows: Verify your agent handles complete conversation paths correctly
- Edge cases: Test interruptions, unexpected input, silence, and barge-in
- Telephony behavior: End-to-end testing over real phone networks catches issues that only surface in production call conditions
- Regressions: Run simulation suites before each deployment to catch breaking changes
Observability
Continuous evaluation of live calls lets you catch regressions, track quality over time, and close the loop between what you test and what users experience. Common approaches include:- Submitting call recordings and transcripts for automated quality scoring
- Tracking evaluation metrics over time to detect quality drift
- Using OpenTelemetry traces to monitor latency and execution flow
Evaluation platforms
Several platforms offer simulation testing and production monitoring for voice AI agents:Bluejay
Simulation, observability, and evaluation platform with native Pipecat Cloud integration. Supports no-code API, WebSocket, and telephony testing.
Coval
Evaluation and testing platform for voice AI agents with simulation and scoring capabilities.
Cekura
Automated testing and quality assurance platform for voice AI agents.
Building an evaluation integration for Pipecat? We welcome contributions to
this page. Open a PR on the docs
repository.
Pipecat’s built-in tools
Pipecat provides several building blocks that feed into any evaluation workflow:- Metrics: Built-in TTFB, processing time, and usage tracking for LLM and TTS services
- Saving transcripts: Capture conversation transcripts for offline analysis and evaluation
- OpenTelemetry: Export traces to any OTel-compatible backend for latency and performance monitoring
- Observers: Monitor frame flow without modifying the pipeline, useful for custom instrumentation
Next steps
Metrics
Monitor performance and LLM/TTS usage with Pipecat’s built-in metrics.
Saving Transcripts
Capture conversation transcripts to use with evaluation tools.
OpenTelemetry
Export traces for performance monitoring and debugging.
Custom Frame Processor
Build custom processors for evaluation-specific instrumentation.